I do not want to give any more marketing exposure; but the terms “medical grade wireless utility”, “relevant architecture”, again have surfaced via another source. It is like this never goes away. While my blog has written extensively about this, (empirical data and credible evidence) I refer you to this from www.cisco.com. A lot of organizations/companies, have used the terms “loosely”, “medical grade wireless utility”, “medical grade network”. This includes both venture funded and huge public companies, so I do not make any distinction here. Further, I do not see where these actual terms or “statements” are copyrighted, so I consider this as public domain. Do these companies actually back the marketing spin with solid facts from a performance and financial perspective via CAPEX and OPEX??? The CIO of any healthcare IDN in 2011 needs to take a careful look at this. Do not believe the marketing..validate everything..big time, before you go down a path of “well I made this decision”. Just heard of yet another major, major IDN decoupling the WLAN from the DAS in 2011. This is becoming a common occurence based upon decisions of the past. I am available for discussions off-line on all of this.

Download Positioning_statement_c07-565470
Download Positioning_statement_c07-565470